mariahelm.com
personal website

mariahelm.com

Space, Pirates, Jules Verne

September 25th, 2007 . by maria

Recent Gutenberg Free text releases

Masters of Space by Edward Everett Evans and E. E. Smith

The Pirate of Panama by William MacLeod Raine

The English at the North Pole by Jules Verne

two kinds of I don’t know

September 24th, 2007 . by maria

http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2007/09/two-kinds-of-do.html
Seth Godin discusses “two kinds of I don’t know ” .
He describes them as the difference between ” I don’t know French ” and ” I don’t know how to cook ” . The first can be fixed with a book or a class. The second is ” …either fear or lack of interest. People with this type of deficit won’t find the answer in a book or (usually) in a seminar either. ”

This was an aha moment for me. We’ve had friends who couldn’t ” get their act together ” , and we’ve tried to help, and it just doesn’t stick. I’ve also had people at work that I’ve tried to train to do something and it just didn’t stick. (Around the Helpdesk watercooler, we’ve often acknowledged ” fear of tehcnology ” as one reason people don’t get along with their computers.)

But the key in this article was, for me, recognizing that the ” fear ” problem was separate from the ” can be solved with a book or a teacher ” problem. Seth says ” If you discover that users are afraid or resistant to what you’re trying to get them to do, more information is almost always the incorrect response. ” Well, smack me, because I’m always talking their ear off. I always figured they didn’t understand how it works, and went off explaining it to them. Apparently ” The effective technique involves peer pressure and support and in changing the design and inputs of what you’re doing so that this group is more receptive to what’s on offer. ” Now, I just have to figure out how to use peer pressure to get people to archive their email…

testing vs agility

September 24th, 2007 . by maria

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/09/20/it_risk/

Gartner group vice-president Richard Hunter also author of ” IT Risk: Turning Business Threats into Competitive Advantage” , defines IT risk as ” anything that poses a risk to either the availability, access, accuracy or agility of a business” . He ranks availability as most important. ” Dollars spent on availability are dollars well spent,” he said.

One thing that jumps out at me is ” agility” . I’ve found that as our company grows, we have been losing agility. As we incorporate more checks and balances and testing into our application development process, we lose the ability to pop out new applications or new features as-needed. As we standardize on certain software and hardware, we lose the willingness to incorporate one-off items where the business processes call for it – at least without a lot of red tape and justification. Even processes themselves, such as processes surrounding purchasing and procurement, can hamper agility.

While I agree that agility is important for a business, I am struggling to see how businesses that are trying to please auditors and improve processes can also maintain agility. Hunter himself seems to recognize this, too: ” IT risk is related to IT value. It would be short-sighted not to recognise either value or risk,” Hunter explained. There are risks associated with agility. When we roll out an application with little testing, it may fail. We allow a department to use a consumer digital camera, but our Helpdesk struggles to offer assistance because they aren’t familiar with the product, and we find there is a hidden cost – it isn’t as durable as the models we usually buy. A new vendor doesn’t deliver quickly enough, and our project is delayed. We spend weeks taking calls from laptop users before we determine that the new laptop battery fits too snugly and doesn’t always charge. We lose agility when things go throught the layers of testing necessary to prevent most of these failures, but we lower our risks.

This article goes on to explain that IT managers need to better be able to explain the risks to executives. But again, it is couched in an explanation of what happens when a server fails, which is a function of availability. Measures which ensure availability are fine, but I think most businesses are seeing the value of availability, access, and accuracy. It is agility which has taken a beating. The article references a loss of agility due to government regulation, but offers no suggestion that this should be considered, and no advice on how to regain agility.

So I’ll offer my advice: build transparency and trust into your IT department, instead of processes and red tape. Give someone personal responsibility for the project, and ensure that they know they will receive the calls if it fails, and they’re likely to do a much better job of preventing it from failing. A bunch of red tape, lab testing, and good vendor references doesn’t guarantee that a new barcode scanner will work. When it fails, who feels personally responsible for getting it fixed? Nobody. ” I checked the vendor’s references ” , says one guy. ” It tested fine in the test lab ” , says another. No one person is personally invested in the project, so why are they going jump up and dig in when it fails? But when someone has a cradle-to-grave relationship with a project, they feel personally responsible when it fails, and come running to the rescue. Give techs the ability to reject layers of testing and red tape when they can explain why they aren’t necessary, and authorization to utilize a complete test lab when they are, and my guess is that there will be just as much testing, but even better results.

DIY, Sci-Fi, and Classics at Gutenberg free books

September 12th, 2007 . by maria

Things To Make by Archibald Williams

Camping For Boys by Henry William Gibson

Dorothy and the Wizard in Oz by L. Frank Baum

Warning from the Stars by Ron Cocking

The Burning Bridge by Poul William Anderson

The Impossibles by Gordon Randall Garrett and Laurence Mark Janifer

Space Prison by Tom Godwin

quotes

September 12th, 2007 . by maria

I, for one, am sick of hearing people blame those in authority as if they were expected to have the wisdom, power, and perfection of God. It’s about time to start judging other people by the standard we wish to have applied to ourselves. If you have ever expected other people to cut you a little slack and overlook your mistakes, then have the decency, when they make mistakes, to try to give them the benefit of the doubt, too.

Orson Scott Card (writer)

SNTT: Paste Plain text

September 4th, 2007 . by maria

I just couldn’t post any SNTT tip better than this.

SNTT:: http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/paste-plain-text

recent Gutenberg free books

September 4th, 2007 . by maria

The Aeneid of Virgil by Virgil
http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/22456
Contributions to the Theory of Natural Selection by Alfred Russel Wallace
http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/22428